Nicholas Bradford says all discipline is self-discipline: “I really feel there isn’t really any external discipline.”
On the Mindfulness Exercises Podcast, Sean Fargo talks with Nicholas Bradford, a lifelong educator and founder of the National Center for Restorative Justice, about how mindfulness and restorative practices apply to everyday conflict, from name-calling in the early grades to threats that lead to expulsion. Bradford describes the questions he asks students and the steps adults can follow when responding under pressure.
Sponsored by our Mindfulness Meditation Teacher Certification Program MindfulnessExercises.com/Certification
Episode Overview:
What the conversation covers:
- Why conflict is the gap between expectation and reality
- How mindfulness fits into moments of conflict
- A sequence for accountability without shame: what happened, what were you trying to accomplish, who was impacted, repair
- Why he asks “what were you trying to accomplish?” instead of “why did you do it?”
- What meaningful repair can look like
- What a reentry circle looks like for a student returning after suspension or expulsion
- Why he says adults go first when implementing restorative practices
- Training options: three-day trainings, facilitation add-ons, and graduate-credit courses
Show Notes:
Reframing Conflict: The Gap Between Expectation and Reality
Bradford describes conflict this way:
Conflict is the gap between expectation and reality.
Sean connects this to practice: when we feel conflict we can notice where it sits in the body, what we expected, and what actually happened, and move toward acceptance rather than resisting. Bradford adds that part of the work is having fewer expectations, of other people, of ourselves, and of how the world should work, and that a “should” is a good indicator of where the conflict is.
Sean’s prompts for noticing conflict in the moment:
- Where in the body the conflict is felt
- What I was expecting
- What actually happened
Bradford’s point is that responsibility is inner work: if all discipline is self-discipline, the adult’s own way of handling conflict comes before any instruction of the student.
Staying Longer With “What Happened?”
Bradford says the first thing to slow down on is letting a student reflect on what happened. “Why did you do it?” tends to invite excuse-making, he says. The first question is:
What happened?
He says adults tend to jump to problem-solving and to getting a promise about next time, while students have not sat in the mess they made long enough to see it as a problem. With small harms, he says, staying with what happened can take weeks or several conversations.
“What Were You Trying to Accomplish?”
Instead of “why did you do that?”, Bradford asks:
What were you trying to accomplish?
He says the answer usually reveals a legitimate need that an adult can validate without excusing the harm. His examples: a student who skips class wanted more time with friends, and a student who acted out wanted a teacher to leave them alone. He uses the same approach with his own young son, who wants to go to the park at bedtime.
By naming the desire without excusing the harm, an adult can:
- Validate the desire behind the behavior (“that totally makes sense”)
- Then move on to asking who was impacted
Building Empathy Through Impact: “Who Was Affected and How?”
The next question is:
Who was impacted, and how?
Bradford says some students answer, “I don’t care.” He replies that he is not asking whether they care, he is asking who was impacted, and asks them to name the people and how each was affected.
He says this lets students save face and keep their respect and status, which he calls an important motivator, especially for teenagers.
Repair That Actually Means Something
For bigger harm, Bradford says the last step is repair: what do we do to make things better? He describes two boys who hugged it out after a fight, agreed it was peer pressure, and went back to class with nothing shared, and says the active side of making amends is what is missing there.
Repair, he says, has to be meaningful, connected work, and cannot be drudgery. His examples:
- A drama class or tutoring program
- Mentorship
- Cleaning up school property
Students who see themselves as the bad kid, he says, need chances to say “I can do good things” and to take part alongside students who are doing the right thing. That is how they can rewrite their self-story from problem to participant.
Reentry Circles: Justice as Public Love
For students returning from suspension or expulsion, Bradford describes reentry circles. He has run them after bomb threats and gun threats.
In these circles, students:
- Name what they did
- Share how they’re thinking differently now
- Describe the projects they are working on to make amends
Parents, teachers, and peers sit in the circle and hear the student. Sean raises a line from the center’s website, a quote from Cornel West, “Justice is what love looks like in public,” and asks where that love came from for Bradford. He points to his mother, and to a day in ninth grade when two boys came to his family’s home to replace a mailbox they had smashed.
For skeptics, Bradford says:
“Just talking about it isn’t gonna get you anywhere. … It is really the experience.”
Implementation Matters: Adults Go First
Bradford says adults have to do the work first: principals and district leaders should sit in circle with their staff if they expect staff to sit in circle with students. Asking adults to be empathetic in classrooms without that practice, he says, sets them and the students up for failure.
The National Center for Restorative Justice offers multiple training pathways, including:
- Three-day intensives
- Two additional days of facilitation training
- A graduate-credit course for educators (Bradford says it is not tied to a degree)
- Occasional 90-minute remote workshops
Bradford says schools that send a group of three to six people to the trainings are much more likely to see long-term effects on discipline, school bonding, and attendance.
👉 Learn more at the National Center for Restorative Justice.
Why Mindfulness and Restorative Justice Belong Together
Sean sees a lot of overlap between restorative justice and mindfulness. Bradford says the internal capacity the work needs is the idea that “I need to do things differently.”
The conversation is aimed at people who care about:
- School culture
- Educator wellbeing
- Youth agency
- Accountability without shame
A Question to Sit With
Where do expectations get in your way—and what kind of repair would move your community forward?
If this conversation was useful, consider sharing it with a colleague, subscribing to the podcast, or leaving a review.
Additional Resources:
- Free Training with Sean Fargo: How to Teach Mindfulness With Confidence & Credibility
- Certification: Mindfulness Meditation Teacher Certification
- Blog: Self-Compassion Myths — A Mindful Conversation with Dr. Dan Siegel
- Blog: Morning Affirmations: The Path to Positivity


