TuneIn
Mindfulness is more popular than ever. It shows up in conference rooms, military trainings, wellness apps, therapy sessions, and social media feeds. And while there’s tremendous good in seeing more people explore awareness and compassion, there’s also an important conversation about how, and why, mindfulness is taught.
In this episode of the Mindfulness Exercises Podcast, Sean Fargo introduces a talk by William Edelglass, Director of Studies at the Barre Center for Buddhist Studies, who spoke as a guest teacher in the Mindfulness Meditation Teacher Certification. Edelglass lays out ethical and political critiques of mindfulness and the mindfulness movement, and some possible responses, including questions of commercialization and of personal insight versus social change.
Edelglass describes himself as a scholar practitioner who thinks mindfulness is really important. In the classical Buddhist traditions he draws on, he says, mindfulness is necessary for ethics and helps us become more ethical.
Sponsored by the Mindfulness Meditation Teacher Certification MindfulnessExercises.com/Certification
What You’ll Learn in This Episode:
- How Edelglass relates mindfulness and ethics in classical Buddhist traditions
- How mindfulness is marketed, from apps and corporate programs to mindful products
- Where “McMindfulness” critiques come from
- The critique that mindfulness is instrumentalized: good, but to what end?
- Research on mindfulness, including the growth in publications and a review of psychological interventions
- Why individualizing distress can overlook systemic causes
- Trauma-informed teaching and consent as general context for teachers
- Sean’s closing question on how mindfulness is taught today
- An invitation to reflect, question, and join the conversation
Show Notes:
Beyond Buzzwords: Why Critiques Matter
Sean opens by noting that mindfulness has become very popular over the last 20 years, that some critiques of it are valid and some, in his opinion, less so, and that he wanted to hear from someone rooted in the Buddhist world.
Edelglass recalls that the philosopher and longtime yoga and meditation practitioner Angela Davis opened a 2014 conversation at an East Bay Meditation Center fundraiser with this question:
“What good is mindfulness if we are inhabiting a world that is so unjust?”
That, Edelglass says, is the question he wants to explore.
What Is “McMindfulness”?
“McMindfulness” is the title of a book by Ronald Purser, who first set out the argument in a Huffington Post commentary. Edelglass summarizes the critique this way:
- Individualizes: it makes each of us responsible for our own well-being and for self-improvement
- Commodifies: he notes that Calm had over half a billion dollars in income last year
- Instrumentalizes: mindfulness is good, but to what end? A sniper can train with it
- Depoliticizes or pacifies: instead of changing material conditions, it focuses on accepting them
Critics like Purser call mindfulness a “neoliberal technology of the self.”
Edelglass adds that the critique is also about authority: mindfulness carries both the authority of an ancient Buddhist wisdom tradition and the legitimacy of modern science.
Mindfulness in Apps, Corporations & the Military
Edelglass notes that meditation is now widely available. He cites a National Institutes of Health survey of 135,000 Americans that points to something like 60 million Americans meditating, notes that more than 2,500 meditation apps launched between 2015 and 2020, and that big companies and the military have invested in mindfulness programs. He says soldiers who go through a mindfulness program are less likely to suffer PTSD after deployment than those who don’t, and that this is a complicated question.
He also shows how widely the word is used to sell things, from mindful mints and mindful mayo to a cannabis company called Mindful. The critique raises questions such as:
- What happens when mindfulness becomes a product?
- Is mindfulness good, and good to what end?
- When organizations offer mindfulness programs, is stress treated as an individual’s responsibility rather than a matter of structural conditions?
Edelglass cites a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental well-being, which found that mindfulness-based and multi-component positive psychological interventions showed the greatest efficacy. He also says Willoughby Britton’s early finding that people who meditate a lot may not sleep as deeply led her to recognize that meditation may not do everything we might think it does.
The Risk of Individualizing Distress
One critique Edelglass describes is that mindfulness discourse treats the stress and well-being of workers, community members, and family systems as individual responsibilities, rather than addressing the structural conditions that make us stressed or diminish our well-being.
Edelglass asks whether mindfulness can be an individual practice that contributes to social and political change, a form of neoliberal self-governance, either one depending on context, or neither.
Returning to the Roots: Ethics & Social Responsibility
Edelglass asks two questions: how does mindfulness affect our moral lives, and is mindfulness necessary for ethics? His answer from classical Buddhist traditions:
- Mindfulness is necessary for ethics
- Mindfulness helps us become more ethical
Edelglass also lists the critique that mindfulness depoliticizes or pacifies. He says he will come back to these points and to some responses.
Trauma-Informed Mindfulness: Consent & Safety Matter
Many teachers integrate trauma-sensitive principles, such as the following (general context for teachers, not a summary of the recording):
- Offering choices
- Normalizing movement
- Using invitational language
- Avoiding coercive instructions
- Emphasizing grounding
- Encouraging community support
- Prioritizing psychological safety
Many teachers consider this important because participants may carry trauma, oppression, or chronic stress.
Mindfulness should never be used to push someone toward emotional territory they are not ready to enter.
Teaching Mindfulness with Integrity
Drawing on these critiques, here are principles for ethical practice and teaching:
1. Provide Context
Teach mindfulness within a framework of ethics, compassion, and interdependence.
2. Encourage Critical Thinking
Invite participants to reflect on why they practice as well as how.
3. Stay Trauma-Informed
Use choice-based, consent-driven, non-coercive approaches.
4. Avoid Overselling
Meditation helps—but it’s not a cure-all.
5. Connect Personal Practice with Social Change
Empower students to see how inner work informs outer action.
6. Foster Community, Not Isolation
Mindfulness is relational as well as individual.
These principles respond to the commodification and individualization critiques.
Sean closes the episode by asking listeners what they think: is mindfulness too commercial, lacking in ethics, or not embodied enough?
About William Edelglass
William Edelglass is the Director of Studies at the Barre Center for Buddhist Studies. He describes himself as a scholar practitioner and teaches retreats at the Insight Meditation Society, the Barre Center, and other centers. Sean introduces him as a longtime professor who has taught at several universities.
Additional Resources:
- Free Training with Sean Fargo: How to Teach Mindfulness With Confidence & Credibility
- Certification: Mindfulness Meditation Teacher Certification
- Blog: 10 Tips for Teaching Mindfulness of Breathing Practices
- Blog: Mindfulness Breathing Exercises: Guide to Techniques and Benefits



